Date: Mon, 6 Sep 2010 07:20:19 GMT From: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> To: freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: amd64/150170: SIG_ATOMIC_MIN/SIG_ATOMIC_MAX 32-bit when sig_atomic_t is 64-bit Message-ID: <201009060720.o867KJWs046492@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR amd64/150170; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: amd64/150170: SIG_ATOMIC_MIN/SIG_ATOMIC_MAX 32-bit when sig_atomic_t is 64-bit Date: Mon, 6 Sep 2010 02:16:31 -0500 ----- Forwarded message from John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> ----- From: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org, Andriy Gapon <avg@icyb.net.ua> Cc: bde@freebsd.org Subject: Re: amd64/150170: SIG_ATOMIC_MIN/SIG_ATOMIC_MAX 32-bit when sig_atomic_t is 64-bit > 32-bit vs 64-bit seems to be reversed here... Yes, but we should still fix this one way or another. I was surprised recently when I found that sig_atomic_t was long on amd64. Perhaps Bruce (cc'd) knows which way it should be fixed? -- John Baldwin _______________________________________________ freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-amd64 To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-amd64-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" ----- End forwarded message -----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201009060720.o867KJWs046492>