Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 12 Oct 1999 15:54:56 -0700 (PDT)
From:      "Jonathan M. Bresler" <jmb@hub.freebsd.org>
To:        dscheidt@enteract.com
Cc:        mckusick@flamingo.McKusick.COM, julian@whistle.com, bde@zeta.org.au, dillon@apollo.backplane.com, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org, committers@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: The eventual fate of BLOCK devices.
Message-ID:  <19991012225456.E1DBB152BA@hub.freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.3.96.991012165540.65198B-100000@shell-1.enteract.com> (message from David Scheidt on Tue, 12 Oct 1999 16:57:49 -0500 (CDT))

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

 Sybase can use either block devices or raw disk.   We run all our
databases, Sybase, Oracle, etc. on raw disk.  the database engineers
here would kill me if i were to ask them to use a block device rather
than raw disk.

jmb


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19991012225456.E1DBB152BA>