Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 19:32:25 +0100 From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> To: "Kenneth D. Merry" <ken@kdm.org> Cc: Rasmus Skaarup <mfbsd@skaarup.org>, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: GEOM code ready for testing Message-ID: <86025.1015957945@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 12 Mar 2002 10:34:23 MST." <20020312103423.A79424@panzer.kdm.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <20020312103423.A79424@panzer.kdm.org>, "Kenneth D. Merry" writes: >> > >Would GEOM support accessing a device via multiple paths? (ie could we >> > >write a method that would do that?) >> > >> > Yes, that would be possible. > >FWIW, Justin and I have been thinking about (for years, actually) doing >multipath support inside CAM. You know, thinking about it, I actually think it is a stronger model to do it in GEOM, since that will be able to cover more cases than CAM will be able to. That said, since I am not on the hook to implement either so I will not impose my opinion one one way or the other :-) -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86025.1015957945>