Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2005 16:58:16 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu@people.tecnik93.com> Cc: Clement Laforet <clement@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/devel/portmk/Mk bsd.apache.mk bsd.database.mk bsd.java.mk bsd.port.mk bsd.port.post.mk bsd.port.pre.mk bsd.port.subdir.mk bsd.tcl.mk ports/devel/portmk/scripts distfiles.sh options.pl options.sh ranksites-fping.pl ... Message-ID: <20050918205816.GA17932@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20050918234714.41544927@it.buh.tecnik93.com> References: <200509182034.j8IKYCUv065506@repoman.freebsd.org> <20050918234714.41544927@it.buh.tecnik93.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--8t9RHnE3ZwKMSgU+ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Sep 18, 2005 at 11:47:14PM +0300, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: > On Sun, 18 Sep 2005 20:34:12 +0000 (UTC) > Clement Laforet <clement@FreeBSD.org> wrote: >=20 > > clement 2005-09-18 20:34:12 UTC > >=20 > > FreeBSD ports repository > >=20 > > Modified files: > > devel/portmk/Mk bsd.port.mk bsd.port.subdir.mk=20 > > Added files: > > devel/portmk/Mk bsd.apache.mk bsd.database.mk bsd.java.mk=20 > > bsd.tcl.mk=20 > > Removed files: > > devel/portmk/Mk bsd.port.post.mk bsd.port.pre.mk=20 > > devel/portmk/scripts distfiles.sh options.pl options.sh=20 > > ranksites-fping.pl ranksites-geoip.pl=20 > > Log: > > - Sync portmk with next exp-build patchset. >=20 > Many thanks. Can we assume that from now on we'll have in this port the > next set of changes one-two weeks before they'll be in the base ? This time it will be at least 1-2 weeks because we can't actually commit the changes until 6.0 is out, but I don't know if we'll be able to do this in future, because this would actually introduce delays into the schedule, which really isn't something we need. Typically when one of us has time to run a test build, the changes are selected then and put into testing almost immediately, with the results known within a day or two. Waiting before starting the test would run the risk of losing the window of availability to run the test build, and waiting afterwards would allow new errors to creep in. > > - Remove temporarily all eik's work. We'll try to find a decent way > > to deal with major changes. Of course we'll reuse his good ideas >=20 > The ranksites* part would be very useful. If you'd like to work on separating out those changes into a discrete patch that can be tested, that would be great. Kris --8t9RHnE3ZwKMSgU+ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDLdTnWry0BWjoQKURAhWUAKCWJ77VuZp2iWvozD1n74k+cBBO1gCfdYdu OqAI8zLC09k02nZ1nLRxPRw= =JHfu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --8t9RHnE3ZwKMSgU+--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050918205816.GA17932>