Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2017 20:19:18 -0500 From: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu> To: Rick Macklem <rmacklem@uoguelph.ca> Cc: "freebsd-current@freebsd.org" <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>, "rc@freebsd.org" <rc@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: small patch for /etc/rc.d/nfsd, bugfix or POLA violation? Message-ID: <20170712011918.GB80947@kduck.kaduk.org> In-Reply-To: <YTXPR01MB0189CD7133238B0E1E9861E4DDAE0@YTXPR01MB0189.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> References: <rmacklem@uoguelph.ca> <YTXPR01MB0189F5614497D4FA96A7579ADDA80@YTXPR01MB0189.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <201707092031.v69KVBSn045623@slippy.cwsent.com> <YTXPR01MB0189CD7133238B0E1E9861E4DDAE0@YTXPR01MB0189.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 11:48:55AM +0000, Rick Macklem wrote: > Cy Schubert wrote: > > > >How about a warning message + an UPDATING entry + no MFC? And, relnotes = > >yes to say we now support RFC7530 in 12.0? > Sounds fine to me. I'll wait to see if there are more comments. Yes, this seems like the sort of thing best done on a major version boundary and not MFC'd. -Ben
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20170712011918.GB80947>