Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 16:18:33 +0100 From: Stijn Hoop <stijn@win.tue.nl> To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> Cc: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>, David Xu <davidx@viasoft.com.cn>, Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org>, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Patch sets to date and timing tests with Giant out of userret. Message-ID: <20020219161833.K29038@pcwin002.win.tue.nl> In-Reply-To: <xzplmdpwln3.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>; from des@ofug.org on Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 04:12:48PM %2B0100 References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0202190120570.56008-100000@InterJet.elischer.org> <xzplmdpwln3.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 04:12:48PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > I'm working on porting the latest beta release of Subversion, which > does all that and more, and has much better diff support than > Perforce. After using Perforce for my PAM work, I've come to the > conclusion that although it's a big step forward from CVS in one > direction (change management & branching), it's a big step backward in > almost every other direction. I can't comment on Perforce, but I can add that I liked subversion even when it wasn't self hosting; it appears promising to say the least. As for your port, there already is a /usr/ports/devel/subversion; it points you to the port skeleton for version r909. Is yours better/different? --Stijn -- "I'm not under the alkafluence of inkahol that some thinkle peep I am. It's just the drunker I sit here the longer I get." [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE8cmzJY3r/tLQmfWcRApKhAKCBOwMYr4632QYpIHY+fFBClED4xgCghKoD scv9dwZWnjXOQvZ5NuMNYkc= =ykNf -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020219161833.K29038>