Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 19 Oct 1998 18:42:02 +0000 (GMT)
From:      Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com>
To:        mike@smith.net.au (Mike Smith)
Cc:        chuckr@mat.net, peter@netplex.com.au, nik@nothing-going-on.demon.co.uk, andyf@speednet.com.au, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: mount flags
Message-ID:  <199810191842.LAA01225@usr02.primenet.com>
In-Reply-To: <199810190558.WAA16555@dingo.cdrom.com> from "Mike Smith" at Oct 18, 98 10:58:13 pm

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

> > If I do the getvfsbyname method, I do no pattern-matching at all
> > (FreeBSD does that for me).  When I do the lookup, the data is good at
> > that point, isn't it, even in the face of the vfs or KLD loads/unloads,
> > right?  And, as long as I do no dismounting (the fs is up) that number
> > can't change on me.  The *set* of available numbers and their mappings
> > can change, but not the one I'm sitting on, right?
> 
> That's correct; a VFS can't be unloaded while it's referenced.

Careful.  For one instance of a program, the return from the
sysctl's is cached by the library function (getvfsbyname(3)).


					Terry Lambert
					terry@lambert.org
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199810191842.LAA01225>