Date: Tue, 17 Feb 1998 11:19:50 +0900 (JST) From: Michael Hancock <michaelh@cet.co.jp> To: Tor Egge <Tor.Egge@idi.ntnu.no> Cc: mike@smith.net.au, toor@dyson.iquest.net, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: VM messed: vm_page_free panic problem Message-ID: <Pine.SV4.3.95.980217111558.13533E-100000@parkplace.cet.co.jp> In-Reply-To: <199802170115.CAA21240@pat.idi.ntnu.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 17 Feb 1998, Tor Egge wrote: > > How can we encourage you to pursue more of these interesting issues? > > Resources? Incentives? Effusive thanks? > > After I've completed my Ph.D. thesis, I might tell you. > > > I've committed it to -current; I was going to ask if it was required > > in -stable (ie. is this a fundamental problem, or just one that's > > arisen out of changes to -current?) > > I believe -stable has the same problem (ffs_getpages calls calls VOP_GETPAGES, > mfs doesn't implement VOP_GETPAGES). This is based upon looking through > the source code, I've not actually triggered the problem in -stable. > > - Tor Egge Somehow, this still seems to be a work-around to me. We shouldn't panic because mfs doesn't implement VOP_GETPAGES. Unfortunately, I can't think of a fix that isn't ugly. Mike Hancock To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.SV4.3.95.980217111558.13533E-100000>