Date: Fri, 17 Apr 1998 09:10:56 +1000 (EST) From: Andrew Reilly <reilly@zeta.org.au> To: hetzels@westbend.net Cc: reilly@zeta.org.au, michael_class@hp.com, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Digitally Signed Messages (Re: HEADS UP: CAM cutover in two wee ks.) Message-ID: <199804162310.JAA06765@gurney.reilly.home> In-Reply-To: <006801bd6947$ea64a1e0$c3e0d9cf@admin.westbend.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 16 Apr, Scot W. Hetzel wrote: > > My Mailer isn't broken, I just wasn't expecting it from this list. And the > extra steps I had to take to read the message. And I was just saying that most of the mailers that I've encountered do not require extra steps to read the message, and so I concluded that one that does must be broken by design. > The real question is does Digitally Signed Messages, and HTML belong on a > Mailing list? Absolutely NOT. HTML is a bit irksome (at the moment---I can see it becoming more and more acceptable with time), but I fail to see how message signing is a nuissance to anyone. Ultimately, I expect all e-mail to be digitally signed by default. -- Andrew "The steady state of disks is full." -- Ken Thompson To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199804162310.JAA06765>