Date: Tue, 18 Feb 1997 20:20:10 +0100 From: roberto@keltia.freenix.fr (Ollivier Robert) To: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CTC Linux Mandate Message-ID: <19970218202010.DV57051@keltia.freenix.fr> In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.3.94.970217155903.189C-100000@misery.sdf.com>; from Tom Samplonius on Feb 17, 1997 16:00:27 -0800 References: <19970217225113.MC38075@keltia.freenix.fr> <Pine.NEB.3.94.970217155903.189C-100000@misery.sdf.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
According to Tom Samplonius: > Huh? Doesn't 2.2 and higher use phkmalloc which according to reports is > *better* than gnumalloc? Plus, isn't gnumalloc being depreciated out of > FreeBSD? 2.2 yes. I think the original poster was talking about 2.1.*... There are a lot a people still in 2.1.* so my comment still apply. -- Ollivier ROBERT -=- The daemon is FREE! -=- roberto@keltia.freenix.fr FreeBSD keltia.freenix.fr 3.0-CURRENT #39: Sun Feb 2 22:12:44 CET 1997
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19970218202010.DV57051>