Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 20 Mar 2003 09:00:25 +0100
From:      Stijn Hoop <stijn@win.tue.nl>
To:        Norikatsu Shigemura <nork@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org, Doug Barton <DougB@FreeBSD.org>
Subject:   Re: mixer for /etc/rc
Message-ID:  <20030320080025.GA51136@pcwin002.win.tue.nl>
In-Reply-To: <200303200218.h2K2IOFE047114@nd250009.gab.xdsl.ne.jp>
References:  <200303190518.h2J5IvFE095473@nd250009.gab.xdsl.ne.jp> <20030319032022.G88684@znfgre.tberna.bet> <20030319115827.GF14565@pcwin002.win.tue.nl> <200303200218.h2K2IOFE047114@nd250009.gab.xdsl.ne.jp>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--tKW2IUtsqtDRztdT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 11:18:24AM +0900, Norikatsu Shigemura wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Mar 2003 12:58:27 +0100
> Stijn Hoop <stijn@win.tue.nl> wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 19, 2003 at 03:23:07AM -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
> > > > 	I want to mixer in /etc/rc (setting sound volume on boot).
> > > > 	I add it to /etc/rc, /etc/defaults/rc.conf, etc...
> > > > 	Would you review and commit?
> > > Off hand, I'd say this is more of an /etc/rc.local, or /usr/local/etc=
/rc.d
> > > thing. We haven't really started down the road of what I generically =
refer
> > > to as "desktop" configuration items in rc.
> > Why *not*? As long as it behaves when run in a system without sound, I =
don't
> > see any reason to make things easier for users, whether they use the ma=
chine
> > as a server or as a desktop.
> > I'd very much like to see (something like) this in the base -- I haven't
> > even looked at these patches but the idea is IMHO worthwhile.
>=20
> 	I think that I don't need it if a little machines requires sound.
> 	But I have many machines (mine or not mine) which use sound (or can
> 	use it).  I almost hate to install these to /etc/rc.local.  And even=20
> 	I want it, many users want it:-).  Different point from setting
> 	/etc/rc.conf is that anyone always check this file, but /etc/rc.local
> 	is not so.

Yes, I agree with you. Making a port out of this is imho plain silly, or
is someone actually relying on the mixer being set to a default value on
bootup?

--Stijn

--=20
"What if everything you see is more than what you see -- the person next to
you is a warrior and the space that appears empty is a secret door to anoth=
er
world? What if something appears that shouldn't? You either dismiss it, or =
you
accept that there is much more to the world than you think. Perhaps it real=
ly
is a doorway, and if you choose to go inside, you'll find many unexpected
things."
		-- Shigeru Miyamoto

--tKW2IUtsqtDRztdT
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQE+eXUZY3r/tLQmfWcRAvFnAJ0WU+TCF8sRRyEbp/wHy9jNNMaaswCdFda0
mlHjliHLSjrGataYYeM/8HI=
=aB51
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--tKW2IUtsqtDRztdT--

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030320080025.GA51136>