Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 11:39:11 +0300 From: Slawa Olhovchenkov <slw@zxy.spb.ru> To: Glen Barber <gjb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Julian Elischer <julian@freebsd.org>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [CFT] packaging the base system with pkg(8) Message-ID: <20160419083911.GG6614@zxy.spb.ru> In-Reply-To: <20160419073117.GG1554@FreeBSD.org> References: <20160302235429.GD75641@FreeBSD.org> <57152CE5.5050500@FreeBSD.org> <9D4B9C8B-41D7-42BC-B436-D23EFFF60261@ixsystems.com> <20160418191425.GW1554@FreeBSD.org> <5715DD2E.903@freebsd.org> <20160419073117.GG1554@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 07:31:17AM +0000, Glen Barber wrote: > On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 03:24:30PM +0800, Julian Elischer wrote: > > We've managed to keep this disease out of BSD since I started to do it in > > 1990. First we laughed/fumed at Sun's Solaris when they unbundled the > > compiler. then we fumed at xorg when hey took a useful package and made 190 > > odd packages out of it. Please don't force this on us! > > > > What isn't clear about the *numerous* statements that no one is being > *forced* to use packaged base? Because nowhere present roadmap about co-existing packaged base and traditionsl install. Because nowhere present roadmap of packaged base future. Because package base is show-stoper for 11.0 relese -- this is read as "11.0 switch to package base".
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20160419083911.GG6614>