Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 15:58:02 -0700 From: Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org> To: Tomas Randa <lists@hosting50.cz> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Dual core CPUs support for the second time Message-ID: <43B1C6FA.3070601@samsco.org> In-Reply-To: <43B1BBE5.6030900@hosting50.cz> References: <20051221204149.GM56798@tigerfish2.my.domain> <200512212204.jBLM4rrR037479@peedub.jennejohn.org> <43B1BBE5.6030900@hosting50.cz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Tomas Randa wrote: > Hello again, > > I`d like to thank for all responses, but my testing of everything was > unsuccessfull in motherboard I have :( > I have one general question? Could it be, because I am using this modern > motherboard with modern chipset which could be unsupported in FBSD? > My motherboard is very new SuperMicro H8SSL-i with ServerWorks HT1000 > chipset, but in his BIOS, there are correctly written 2 cores in 1 > physical CPU and CPU is recognized as dual core Athlon 64 X2 > > What is confusing me is dmesg - for example from current/i386 - system > show correctly 2 cores per package, but second CPU is not launched or > recognized by ioapic. > > I tried upgrade BIOS with unofficial version, which sent me technical > support of SuperMicro, but no change. > > DMESG attached to this message > > > Thanks a lot for any help. > > Tomas Randa > I don't see anything in your dmesg about the APIC devices that should be there. Did you somehow omit that from your kernel config, or have it disabled in /boot/loader.conf? Without the apic device, the other CPU's can't get started. Can you run 'acpidump -d -t' and 'mptable'? Are you running an i386 or amd64 kernel? Scott
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?43B1C6FA.3070601>