Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2003 10:09:15 +0200 From: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> To: Mark Sergeant <msergeant@snsonline.net> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 5.1-RELEASE TODO Message-ID: <20030602100915.0fce072a.Alexander@Leidinger.net> In-Reply-To: <1054539507.853.39.camel@xyzzy.wireless.snsonline.net> References: <200306011300.h51D0DMH042667@fledge.watson.org> <20030601165406.20550ba0.Alexander@Leidinger.net> <3EDA3BFA.1020602@btc.adaptec.com> <20030602092716.1149ed90.Alexander@Leidinger.net> <1054539507.853.39.camel@xyzzy.wireless.snsonline.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 02 Jun 2003 17:38:28 +1000
Mark Sergeant <msergeant@snsonline.net> wrote:
> Umm shouldn't you be trying to umount /mnt ?
I retested this and now used /mnt in the umount invocation... (<blush>I
hope I'm awake now.</blush>).
It umounts now successfully. I noticed some commits to the vfs layer
between my last kernel and the actual one, either the bug is fixed now
(I'm sure last time I had the problems I used /mnt in the umount
invocation, not any other mounted FS), or the bug only get's triggered
only in a specific situation I wasn't able to reproduce now.
Bye,
Alexander.
--
The best things in life are free, but the
expensive ones are still worth a look.
http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net
GPG fingerprint = C518 BC70 E67F 143F BE91 3365 79E2 9C60 B006 3FE7
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030602100915.0fce072a.Alexander>