Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2014 12:17:21 +0100 From: Dimitry Andric <dim@FreeBSD.org> To: Jakub Lach <jakub_lach@mailplus.pl> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP: merged llvm/clang 3.4 Message-ID: <76A1AA7F-E526-4481-B04D-0405D3090D93@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <1395476852973-5896505.post@n5.nabble.com> References: <0E7E81A1-54E9-4920-A360-005A1C0C4D47@FreeBSD.org> <1395476852973-5896505.post@n5.nabble.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On 22 Mar 2014, at 09:27, Jakub Lach <jakub_lach@mailplus.pl> wrote: > I see that boost-libs does not build with clang 3.4 here, hopefully > it will without OPTIMIZED_CFLAGS. Strange, I've built boost several times with clang 3.4, on both 9-STABLE and 10-STABLE. Which branch are you using, and are you using libc++ or libstdc++? Any other special environment settings? -Dimitry [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.22 (Darwin) iEYEARECAAYFAlMtcUsACgkQsF6jCi4glqP/UwCg44+HLRfxP1NSguHt90JerD8K f4sAoJb7KH1v2JgTb0YGkWLSa9ytUubY =Kv2u -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?76A1AA7F-E526-4481-B04D-0405D3090D93>