Date: Sat, 14 Sep 1996 19:03:04 +0000 (GMT) From: Adam David <adam@veda.is> To: alex@freefall.freebsd.org (Alex Nash) Cc: CVS-committers@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-all@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-share@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/share/doc/handbook firewalls.sgml Message-ID: <199609141903.TAA10011@veda.is> In-Reply-To: <199609141718.KAA25786@freefall.freebsd.org> from Alex Nash at "Sep 14, 96 10:18:13 am"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> alex 96/09/14 10:18:13 > > Modified: share/doc/handbook firewalls.sgml > Log: > Revert the description of -N to its original form. It was right the > first time. > > Revision Changes Path > 1.12 +2 -2 src/share/doc/handbook/firewalls.sgml > then why does the manpage point out that service names are not accepted as valid port specifications, and why does the implementation explicitly reject any attempt to specify a service by name instead of by number? Adam
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199609141903.TAA10011>