Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 25 Mar 2014 09:38:54 -0600
From:      Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>
To:        lev@FreeBSD.org
Cc:        freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: WITHOUT_XXX leftovers.
Message-ID:  <611926EB-C197-465C-946D-42FA92F2ED9D@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <536067125.20140325170501@serebryakov.spb.ru>
References:  <536067125.20140325170501@serebryakov.spb.ru>

index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail


On Mar 25, 2014, at 7:05 AM, Lev Serebryakov <lev@FreeBSD.org> wrote:

> Hello, Freebsd-current.
> 
> I try to trim my NanoBSD install as much as possible without going to add
> "rm /usr/bin/as" to customization steps (ok, I remove /usr/include and
> /usr/lib/*.a, but it I don't want cherry-pick binaries).
> 
> So, I have WITHOUT_BINUTILS, WITHOUT_CLANG, WITHOUT_MAN (among others) but I have:
> 
> /usr/bin/ar
> /usr/bin/c89
> /usr/bin/c99
> /usr/bin/flex
> /usr/bin/flex++
> /usr/bin/lex
> /usr/bin/lex++ (all 4 is the same. of course)
> /usr/bin/byacc
> /usr/bin/yacc (again, hardlinks)
> /usr/bin/mandoc
> /usr/bin/ranlib (same as ar)
> 
> Also, IMHO, it will be nice to have knob for vi, which is rather huge and
> another one for all bhyve stuff and one more for openssl _binary_.

Yes, we need knobs to turn these off… They are small, but every little bit counts…
They aren’t technically part of BINUTITLS anymore…

Warner




help

Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?611926EB-C197-465C-946D-42FA92F2ED9D>