Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2018 14:08:11 -0500 From: "Mikhail T." <mi+b@aldan.algebra.com> To: Stefan Esser <se@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, brendan+freebsd@bbqsrc.net Subject: Re: Need help with sysutils/fusefs-smbnetfs Message-ID: <2aea2d83-7c73-0965-b3be-2964a548823d@aldan.algebra.com> In-Reply-To: <cebd24ef-07b6-ebb7-4da3-8f4fcf2f95df@freebsd.org> References: <8868a37f-90ad-a271-2295-bf67164fad19@aldan.algebra.com> <cebd24ef-07b6-ebb7-4da3-8f4fcf2f95df@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
2/1/2018 3:48 AM, Stefan Esser пише:
>
> Did you test with version 3 of the FUSE library? The port should be
> converted to that version, anyway, since development of version 2 has
> stopped.
>
I just committed the changes necessary to build with fuse3, should the
user so desire or should the default fuse-version change.
However, I can not report any obvious advantages from using it at this
time. Worse, because the direct_io option -- despite being documented in
mount_fusefs(8) -- is not supported by fuse3, the read-throughput is now
back down to hundreds of kilobytes per second... As you may remember, by
using direct_io I was able to go up to 8MB/second with fuse2 (although
smbclient itself could read at 20MB/s).
Yours,
-mi
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?2aea2d83-7c73-0965-b3be-2964a548823d>