Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2003 22:16:38 +0200 From: "Roderick van Domburg" <r.s.a.vandomburg@student.utwente.nl> To: <culverk@yumyumyum.org> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Benchmarking KSE and SMPng Message-ID: <000d01c37646$1c053f00$6ba55982@gog> References: <000901c37628$d683ff10$6ba55982@gog> <1063042016.cea6637e4e7eb@mailhub.yumyumyum.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Just in case you don't know, there is no 5-STABLE yet. All the 5.x
Releases have
> been based on -CURRENT.
Indeed, I stand corrected.
> > Question is then which {application,theoretical} benchmarks to run under
> > which circumstances. Although I've heard of bonnie et al, I'm new to the
> > benchmarking business and welcome any suggestions.
> >
> Something that might be interesting to try is running mysql with libc_r,
> linuxthreads, libkse, and libthr, using the included mysql benchmarks that
come
> with mysql. I used those benchmarks to test mysql on a few of the machines
I
> needed to install it on at one point, and I know mysql utilizes threads.
Off
> the top of my head I can't think of anything other than databases that
> performed badly on FreeBSD before due to threading issues.
How about Apache2 or locked subsystems (I/O and networking spring to mind)?
Regards,
Roderick
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?000d01c37646$1c053f00$6ba55982>