Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2024 14:31:49 -0700 From: "Simon J. Gerraty" <sjg@juniper.net> To: =?us-ascii?Q?=3D=3Futf-8=3FQ=3FDag-Erling=5FSm=3DC3=3DB8rgrav=3F=3D?= <des@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz>, <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org>, <sjg@juniper.net> Subject: Re: filemon Message-ID: <93999.1722461509@kaos.jnpr.net> In-Reply-To: <86sevr5fyj.fsf@ltc.des.dev> References: <ZqT6_a_0F8DCUsBm@int21h> <CAFDf7UKxhSu%2BqMGV1KahrSX9ho8vFut4avxNVX4D8QGa6%2B%2BTjQ@mail.gmail.com> <20240727170122.675f6bfe@ernst.home> <865xsn6ya9.fsf@ltc.des.dev> <a5471d18-7f88-4e24-8518-2c7a67ddd7f1@quip.cz> <86sevr5fyj.fsf@ltc.des.dev>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
Dag-Erling Smørgrav <des@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > Loader I/O performance is much better these days so loading modules > pre-boot doesn't slow the boot down much any more, but it's still more That depends very much on the h/w, especially the storage attachment. None of which applies to any machine likely to be using filemon of course.help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?93999.1722461509>