Date: Thu, 20 May 2004 23:14:47 +0100 From: Bruce M Simpson <bms@spc.org> To: Andre Oppermann <andre@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ia_netbroadcast Message-ID: <20040520221447.GG86489@empiric.dek.spc.org> In-Reply-To: <40AD1B39.AAF75D9D@freebsd.org> References: <20040518092439.GF845@darkness.comp.waw.pl> <20040518024346.A5068@xorpc.icir.org> <20040518100503.GG845@darkness.comp.waw.pl> <20040518034756.A9648@xorpc.icir.org> <20040520152127.GP845@darkness.comp.waw.pl> <40AD1B39.AAF75D9D@freebsd.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Thu, May 20, 2004 at 10:55:21PM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote: > However I'm not yet sure we (better I) understand all implications of > removing the things you do in your patch. Please hold off for a moment > until I've finished thinking and looking through the implications. I say can it. It appears to have outlived what little usefulness it might once have had. This is just based on a quick look over what it does in TCP/IP Illustrated Vol 2 and a look at where it's actually referenced within the kernel. If userland needs to see it, it can easily be served up on demand. Regards, BMShome | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040520221447.GG86489>