Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 06:18:06 -0400 From: Tom Rhodes <trhodes@FreeBSD.org> To: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, gad@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: "Chatty" config files in /etc Message-ID: <20060831061806.0c022552.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20060831100004.GB52914@rambler-co.ru> References: <200608290920.k7T9KmV9067843@repoman.freebsd.org> <86zmdmfoow.fsf@dwp.des.no> <p0623091cc11b704fff62@[128.113.24.47]> <20060830202834.GA11284@rambler-co.ru> <p0623091dc11bbf999504@[128.113.24.47]> <20060831100004.GB52914@rambler-co.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 31 Aug 2006 14:00:04 +0400 Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > > > No, /etc/defaults are different beasties -- they are true > default config files -- they are either used if there's no > corresponding version under /etc, or most likely sourced > to provide defaults. To be moved to /etc/defaults, a file > should gain the same property. While this comment is blatently obvious: /etc/examples ;) -- Tom Rhodes
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060831061806.0c022552.trhodes>