Date: Sun, 28 Jul 1996 14:11:23 -0700 From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com> To: "Karl Denninger, MCSNet" <karl@mcs.com> Cc: mark@quickweb.com (Mark Mayo), hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: PPro Question Message-ID: <3147.838588283@time.cdrom.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 28 Jul 1996 15:31:16 CDT." <m0ukcUf-000IDOC@venus.mcs.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I can also set up a SUP server for the CVS tree if people are interested. > Would this help folks? We have *lots* of free cycles and net bandwidth, so > we're not constrained at all. What I don't think I will be able to do right That's be great - sup2 being down since Paul moved jobs has really hurt us since none of the others were ever as reliable as sup2, and now everyone's back to swamping freefall again. If I can ever get John to finally release cvsup, we could also deploy that on the box and serve cvs, -current and -stable all from the single repository and with no need to cvs update a checked-out tree, as we do now for -sup. I was actually just in the process of creating another sup2 with Paul Vixie, who'll site the server at DEC's NAP, but 3 "major" [cv]sup servers would be even better than 2, so please don't let that stop you. > Anyone? Give me a list and amount of disk required (will it fit on a > 4G drive?) and I'll go grab it. No big deal; 4G disks are only about a > kilobuck these days, and I have a bunch of them available to me. Dedicating Heck, if you can make the machine generally accessible to me via ssh, I'll set it all up myself. I was already planning to do this in Paul's case, and if I can set the 2 machines up fairly identically it would make these resources even easier to manage in the future. Jordan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3147.838588283>