Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2002 22:23:11 +1000 (EST) From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> To: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org> Cc: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org>, <cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org>, <cvs-all@FreeBSD.org>, Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org>, Bruce Evans <bde@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/secure/lib/libcrypto Makefile.inc src/secure/lib/libssl Makefile Message-ID: <20020921221001.W10177-100000@gamplex.bde.org> In-Reply-To: <20020921111609.GC98578@sunbay.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 21 Sep 2002, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 21, 2002 at 08:04:52AM +1000, Bruce Evans wrote:
> > On Fri, 20 Sep 2002, David O'Brien wrote:
> ...
> > A version of "make installincludes" that doesn't spam /usr/include might
> > be useful.
> >
> Where this version would install their headers? ${.OBJDIR}/openssl?
Some temporary place.
> How then we would track the headers dependencies?
Not :-). The temporary usr/include would esentially give a small part
of the world environment and you could delete it after using it.
> > The (rather large) dependencies for the generated headers were mostly
> >
> Most headers aren't even generated, they are just collected all over
> and copied into a single place.
By "generated", I just mean that they are built in the object tree. It
doesn't really matter how complicated the rule for building them is
(except complicated rules and dependencies will complicate the Makefile).
Bruce
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020921221001.W10177-100000>