Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 31 Jan 2010 16:40:03 -0800
From:      David Wolfskill <david@catwhisker.org>
To:        Dmitry Morozovsky <marck@rinet.ru>
Cc:        freebsd-security@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: security scripts diff
Message-ID:  <20100201004003.GE12157@bunrab.catwhisker.org>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1002010310180.61449@woozle.rinet.ru>
References:  <alpine.BSF.2.00.1002010310180.61449@woozle.rinet.ru>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

[-- Attachment #1 --]
On Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at 03:13:39AM +0300, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote:
> Dear colleagues,
> 
> looking at regular security mails I found that foloowing patch would greatly 
> desreases amount of false positive reports; it's totally possible I'm missing 
> some vital areas, but my current look at security scripts did not reveal any.
> 
> What do you think? Thank you in advance.
> ...

I think maybe -b ("Ignore changes in the amount of white space.") might
be better than -w ("Ignore all white space."), as the presence or
absence of *some* white space can be a signifant difference (e.g., to a
non-FORTRAN IV parser).
                                                                                
Peace,                                                                          
david                                                                           
-- 
David H. Wolfskill				david@catwhisker.org
Depriving a girl or boy of an opportunity for education is evil.

See http://www.catwhisker.org/~david/publickey.gpg for my public key.

[-- Attachment #2 --]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD)

iEYEARECAAYFAktmIuIACgkQmprOCmdXAD1feQCeMeOiFninPLwayWXVpOFE8UEm
LygAn0dPlrswgjgrJxm31Qq0zSvGmq3g
=n+/P
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100201004003.GE12157>