Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2010 16:40:03 -0800 From: David Wolfskill <david@catwhisker.org> To: Dmitry Morozovsky <marck@rinet.ru> Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: security scripts diff Message-ID: <20100201004003.GE12157@bunrab.catwhisker.org> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1002010310180.61449@woozle.rinet.ru> References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1002010310180.61449@woozle.rinet.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Q8BnQc91gJZX4vDc
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at 03:13:39AM +0300, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote:
> Dear colleagues,
>=20
> looking at regular security mails I found that foloowing patch would grea=
tly=20
> desreases amount of false positive reports; it's totally possible I'm mis=
sing=20
> some vital areas, but my current look at security scripts did not reveal =
any.
>=20
> What do you think? Thank you in advance.
> ...
I think maybe -b ("Ignore changes in the amount of white space.") might
be better than -w ("Ignore all white space."), as the presence or
absence of *some* white space can be a signifant difference (e.g., to a
non-FORTRAN IV parser).
=
=20
Peace, =
=20
david =
=20
--=20
David H. Wolfskill david@catwhisker.org
Depriving a girl or boy of an opportunity for education is evil.
See http://www.catwhisker.org/~david/publickey.gpg for my public key.
--Q8BnQc91gJZX4vDc
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD)
iEYEARECAAYFAktmIuIACgkQmprOCmdXAD1feQCeMeOiFninPLwayWXVpOFE8UEm
LygAn0dPlrswgjgrJxm31Qq0zSvGmq3g
=n+/P
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--Q8BnQc91gJZX4vDc--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100201004003.GE12157>