Date: Fri, 17 Apr 1998 09:15:31 +1000 (EST) From: Andrew Reilly <reilly@zeta.org.au> To: grog@lemis.com Cc: reilly@zeta.org.au, hetzels@westbend.net, michael_class@hp.com, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Digitally Signed Messages (Re: HEADS UP: CAM cutover in two wee ks.) Message-ID: <199804162315.JAA06772@gurney.reilly.home> In-Reply-To: <19980416162753.I1090@freebie.lemis.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 16 Apr, Greg Lehey wrote: > On Thu, 16 April 1998 at 10:05:20 +1000, Andrew Reilly wrote: >> On 15 Apr, Scot W. Hetzel wrote: >>> X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.2106.4 >>> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2106.4 > > Just because it's Outlook? No. I've never used Outlook, but I've been biassed against Microsoft's e-mail products by the obnoxious things all of the previous versions have done to me over the years. My original comment was intended to suggest that a mailer that did not handle digital signatures in a way that is convenient for the recipient must be broken by design. Note that convenient handling can legitimately include ignoring it altogether, or tagging it as an unrecognised MIME attachment. -- Andrew "The steady state of disks is full." -- Ken Thompson To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199804162315.JAA06772>