Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2016 19:47:19 -0800 From: Eitan Adler <eadler@freebsd.org> To: Jason Helfman <jgh@freebsd.org> Cc: Remko Lodder <remko@freebsd.org>, svn-doc-head@freebsd.org, svn-doc-all@freebsd.org, doc-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r48150 - head/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/explaining-bsd Message-ID: <CAF6rxgmsyUfED0ppbZytbZtRugnvj6bRgpE6_MKqWE8z%2B1E3VQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAMuy=%2BgmYhVeDwGaWf1aRPW67RN9Mr2_r_s3ssnbKOoSbXmZGg@mail.gmail.com> References: <201602040801.u1481r5j087645@repo.freebsd.org> <1D0251FC-4524-49F3-8B11-A76E787D1270@FreeBSD.org> <CAF6rxgmGppjJjpJWb_yDpg7SWxp3pV9MFGFW9w4xLzZFBAFzBw@mail.gmail.com> <376A469D-74FC-4C14-B783-D80B2B34A552@FreeBSD.org> <CAMuy=%2BgmYhVeDwGaWf1aRPW67RN9Mr2_r_s3ssnbKOoSbXmZGg@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 5 February 2016 at 09:33, Jason Helfman <jgh@freebsd.org> wrote: > While I understand the reasoning behind this, and appreciate the > mentioning of what could be added, removing an old and potentially > relevant entry without adding new content is perceived as an issue. > Additionally, have you considered reaching out to our Yahoo! > committers, or Yahoo!, to see if they would have any more current > statistics so we may update the site (assuming it isn't a small > amount, and is comparable to other service providers)? As I recall, > this was an opening to listing other service providers that use BSD, > and thought it was a nice transition. I had some changes from a few months ago when I had time to work on this document. Recently I found them again and committed them again. Should I have time I'll return and try to modernize it some more. It makes sense that just removing content is perceived as an issue but having insanely old content is also an issue. -- Eitan Adler Source, Ports, Doc committer Bugmeister, Ports Security teams
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAF6rxgmsyUfED0ppbZytbZtRugnvj6bRgpE6_MKqWE8z%2B1E3VQ>