Date: Sat, 8 Oct 2005 10:04:58 +0800 From: "Mao Shou Yan" <david.mao@thomson.net> To: <das-keyword-net.6770cb@seddon.ca> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: RE: problems with em(4) Message-ID: <31021C278A7A6B4AB95E9A085C3552181F78FA@bjngsmail01>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I modify kernel codes to stat that. And it's test in a real telecom environment. -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Dave+Seddon Sent: 2005Äê10ÔÂ3ÈÕ 6:15 To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: problems with em(4) Greetings, > M> The problem is: > M> > M> After the system run about 3 hours, there will be large "Ierrs" > M> The system is not heavy loaded, incoming rates of em0 is less > M> than 150Mbits/s. em1 and em2 are not connected. > M> > M> After 3 hours, the ierrs raise quickly every 1 minutes! > M> > M> I think is a problem with em(4) driver. > M> > M> Anyone meet such condition? Yes. Lots of people. 3 hours does seem to be the magic number, regardless of the volumne of traffic. I'm interested in what you do sniffing 150MB/s. Normally libpcap can't handle that amount of traffic. Regards, Dave Seddon _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?31021C278A7A6B4AB95E9A085C3552181F78FA>