Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 07:37:40 -0500 From: Eric Anderson <anderson@freebsd.org> To: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> Cc: cvs-src@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/bin/cp cp.1 cp.c utils.c Message-ID: <47D67D14.8010106@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <200803101747.51354.jhb@freebsd.org> References: <200803101958.m2AJwfmm037050@repoman.freebsd.org> <20080310.144327.-856141340.imp@bsdimp.com> <200803101747.51354.jhb@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
John Baldwin wrote: > On Monday 10 March 2008 04:43:27 pm M. Warner Losh wrote: >> In message: <200803101958.m2AJwfmm037050@repoman.freebsd.org> >> John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> writes: >> : jhb 2008-03-10 19:58:41 UTC >> : >> : FreeBSD src repository >> : >> : Modified files: >> : bin/cp cp.1 cp.c utils.c >> : Log: >> : Add an '-a' option which is identical to specifying '-RpP' for >> : compatibility with other implementations. >> : >> : MFC after: 1 month >> >> Submitted by: David Frascone at Cisco >> >> right? > > Don't think so. I've had this patch for almost 2 years now on my laptop from > the first time this came up (back when -l was added IIRC). The recent thread > just reminded me to commit it. :) The recent thread also had a patch that > used -rpP whereas -RpP is more correct IMO. > Thanks John for committing this!! This makes life easier for rsnapshot users too. Eric p.s. - I think I was the original submitter along with the -l patch.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?47D67D14.8010106>