Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 01 Jan 2019 11:24:38 +0000
From:      "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
To:        Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert@cschubert.com>
Cc:        Damjan Jovanovic <damjan.jov@gmail.com>, Hackers freeBSD <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Speculative: Rust for base system components
Message-ID:  <44610.1546341878@critter.freebsd.dk>
In-Reply-To: <201901010800.x0180Is3058668@slippy.cwsent.com>
References:  <201901010800.x0180Is3058668@slippy.cwsent.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--------
In message <201901010800.x0180Is3058668@slippy.cwsent.com>, Cy Schubert wr=
ites:

>I'm with Warner. No. Rust should remain in ports. Apps that depend on =

>rust should be in ports. Optional kernel modules should also be in =

>ports.

And we should get pkgbase pushed across the finish-line and split the most
rarely used parts of src into ports as well.

-- =

Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    =

Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence=
.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?44610.1546341878>