Date: Thu, 10 Apr 1997 21:14:06 -0400 (EDT) From: Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> To: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org> Cc: wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (Garrett Wollman), current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: WHY? ...non-use of TAILQ macros... Message-ID: <199704110114.VAA05848@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> In-Reply-To: <199704110039.RAA10331@phaeton.artisoft.com> References: <199704110021.UAA05660@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> <199704110039.RAA10331@phaeton.artisoft.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
<<On Thu, 10 Apr 1997 17:39:39 -0700 (MST), Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org> said:
>> > kern_lockf.c: while (ltmp = overlap->lf_blkhd.tqh_first) {
>> 2. Because they are unnecessary.
> Well, that begs the question of qhy they are being used in declarations
> and elsewhere, then, doesn't it?
I never said that the declaration macros were unnecessary. I said
that macros like TAILQ_FIRST are unnecessary. Some people disagree
(notably David G. and Justin).
-GAWollman
--
Garrett A. Wollman | O Siem / We are all family / O Siem / We're all the same
wollman@lcs.mit.edu | O Siem / The fires of freedom
Opinions not those of| Dance in the burning flame
MIT, LCS, CRS, or NSA| - Susan Aglukark and Chad Irschick
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199704110114.VAA05848>