Date: Sun, 12 Oct 1997 10:37:45 -0700 From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com> To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> Cc: Søren Schmidt <sos@sos.freebsd.dk>, rickl@ic.net, current@FreeBSD.ORG, sos@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: possible sc0 problem Message-ID: <3379.876677865@time.cdrom.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 12 Oct 1997 18:45:16 %2B0200." <14855.876674716@critter.freebsd.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Can you remmeber where we have that special version of the pointed > hat that says "POLA" in large friendly letters on the front ? Not much of an argument for me since the very first time I tried to use this without a custom keymap, POLA was violated. I *expect* that to be my META key and evidently so do a number of other folks. Now if you want to argue this from a *precedent* vs POLA perspective then I'll give LALT full marks for precedence. If a compromise could be reached which would leave this as META for us emacs users (and trust me, LALT is *the* key we need it to be - nothing else is situated as well on the keyboard as a modifier) let still act the same when mated with a function key, I'd be all for it. Jordan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3379.876677865>