Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2020 14:58:54 +0100 From: Rainer Hurling <rhurlin@gwdg.de> To: Mateusz Piotrowski <0mp@FreeBSD.org>, <ports-committers@freebsd.org>, <svn-ports-all@freebsd.org>, <svn-ports-head@freebsd.org> Cc: <0xdutra@gmail.com>, <arrowd@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r554855 - head/net-mgmt/pushgateway Message-ID: <69413cae-fb70-2654-68e8-350aceaf1e14@gwdg.de> In-Reply-To: <4510b739-13d0-d8c2-0458-e1770309972e@FreeBSD.org> References: <202011102004.0AAK4fHl090249@repo.freebsd.org> <4510b739-13d0-d8c2-0458-e1770309972e@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Am 11.11.20 um 11:58 schrieb Mateusz Piotrowski: > On 11/10/20 9:04 PM, Rainer Hurling wrote: >> Author: rhurlin >> Date: Tue Nov 10 20:04:41 2020 >> New Revision: 554855 >> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/554855 >> >> Log: >> net-mgmt/pushgateway: Update to 0.10.0 >> This release changes the storage format. v0.10 can read the storage >> format >> of v0.5–v0.9. It will then persist the new format so that a downgrade >> won't be possible anymore[1]. >> [1] https://github.com/prometheus/pushgateway/releases/tag/v0.10.0 >> For this port 0.10.0, it is intended to replace it with a version >> >= 1.3.x >> from about four weeks on. So there will be four weeks for the >> migration. > I am not sure but it sounds like it might be a good idea to mention it > in UPDATING. Thanks for the hint. I talked about it with Gleb Popov, one of my mentors. He argued in your way (thank you, Gleb). UPDATING usually contains important information about port updates. And a downgrade from net-mgmt/pushgateway after an update from 0.10.0 to > 1.0.0 is not useful. So an entry in UPDATING can help users to migrate in time. I will prepare a patch for an entry in UPDATING :)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?69413cae-fb70-2654-68e8-350aceaf1e14>