Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2003 01:44:44 +0400 From: Andrey Chernov <ache@nagual.pp.ru> To: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@freebsd.org> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: buildworld broken after installworld Message-ID: <20030804214444.GA55421@nagual.pp.ru> In-Reply-To: <20030804203219.GF1445@sunbay.com> References: <20030804195135.0562a9a2.yosimoto@waishi.jp> <20030804114723.GB39384@sunbay.com> <20030804223833.6c9a6718.yosimoto@waishi.jp> <20030804134636.GA39138@nagual.pp.ru> <20030804135713.GA39289@nagual.pp.ru> <20030804140332.GA39367@nagual.pp.ru> <20030804141858.GB60105@sunbay.com> <xzpu18xp7wn.fsf@dwp.des.no> <20030804203219.GF1445@sunbay.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--d6Gm4EdcadzBjdND Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 23:32:19 +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > I think we've now reached the agreement with Andrey that > a more correct, safe, and portable [sic] construct would > be "LC_ALL=C tr [:lower:] [:upper:]". It works the same > in any non-broken operating system and with any locale. We need to say, construct for what? If for lower->upper replacing inside ASCII only, "LC_ALL=C tr [a-z] [A-Z]" is most portable because some tr implementations even not understand [:class:] but some other have SysV-ism to specify ranges in the [], against what POSIX says. But I think that "LC_ALL=C tr a-z A-Z" is better middle point here because not teach user to incorrect syntax from the scripts. --d6Gm4EdcadzBjdND Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (FreeBSD) iQCVAwUBPy7TzOJgpPLZnQjrAQETBgP9Hpw6mUi64E9CrflJ27KLa02CAUYJZdWO /l/hlZBEceP+H1bzGD1DMdTd709mOPBNLkV2YgKkAkeQR4WfuT0ygRNqEZ6QwAI5 dETIvOYsCZ4cV6SbOoDeyYEDGSIg85I9GOaenJ+C3DjXDEBJvyXhr2GvPi0OULU4 UCF54dePDQI= =vUpW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --d6Gm4EdcadzBjdND--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030804214444.GA55421>