Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 15:26:34 -0600 From: "Jason J. W. Williams" <jasonjwwilliams@gmail.com> To: Martin Matuska <mm@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, grarpamp <grarpamp@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [CFT] ZFS v15 patch (version 3) Message-ID: <AANLkTinY29xrdPuqyBdTW7ncy1zAwlOoqtkHjRS0ZCTG@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4C3D678E.5040403@FreeBSD.org> References: <AANLkTin7I5TKcaEL5bVUXZhjHDXhJIOo4Qv1tVgGhcqa@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTil6vRybs5MQ4jP1Acx3C8VYowwHrG9-EpEH-NxR@mail.gmail.com> <4C3D08A5.2090109@dataix.net> <4C3D678E.5040403@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hey Martin, Actually it's this one: http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=3D6574286 -J On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 1:30 AM, Martin Matuska <mm@freebsd.org> wrote: > =C2=A0What about the OpenSolaris revision 9701 for starters? > Could that help your case? > > 9701:cc5b64682e64 > > 6803605 should be able to offline log devices > http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=3D6803605 > > 6726045 vdev_deflate_ratio is not set when offlining a log device > http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=3D6726045 > > D=C5=88a 14. 7. 2010 2:45, jhell wrote / nap=C3=ADsal(a): >> On 07/13/2010 12:30, Jason J. W. Williams wrote: >>> If there's any way to backport ZFS log device removal that would be >>> very helpful. That's the primary hold up for ops folks moving our >>> OpenSolaris servers to FreeBSD. >> I second this. >> >> In explanation I have one machine that needs to be rearranged for a >> upgrade/update for a different purpose than what it is currently doing >> that is holding up some of the other tasks that are planned. I already >> made the mistake once in a test situation by removing a log device that >> was da0 during a reboot & popped in another device, something happened, >> rebooted the machine, plugged in original and the situation was >> irreparable causing the pool to be corrupt. >> >> Needless to say it was only a test environment but this has stopped me >> cold from using further log devices because of this. ;( >> >> This is not really top priority right now but would be a great Christmas >> present ;) >> >> If someone points me in the right direction I guess I could always start >> reviewing the changes for inclusion on a patch against head & stable/8. >> >> >> Regards, Thanks & Good Luck, >> >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTinY29xrdPuqyBdTW7ncy1zAwlOoqtkHjRS0ZCTG>