Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2015 07:52:19 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 156226] [lagg]: failover does not announce the failover to switch Message-ID: <bug-156226-2472-ReuixGXsZ8@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-156226-2472@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-156226-2472@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=156226 --- Comment #12 from weberge42@gmail.com --- Yes, but each switch has different default and miniumum values. Fortiswitch: 10s, HP Procurve 60s, don't know about cisco. So that would mean XXs no service in case of a failover which may be acceptable if its short enough. But what if you can't (or not allowed) to change this settings ? I don't quite understand what you mean with: >And yes, lagg's failover needs that NIC drivers bring link down in case of >voluntary "ifconfig down" Who issues the ifconfig down ? I just don't see any relationship between manual ifconfig in case of a failover. Can you please elaborate this a bit more ? Maybe i'm missing something. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-156226-2472-ReuixGXsZ8>