Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2024 17:12:06 +0000 From: David Chisnall <theraven@FreeBSD.org> To: Tomoaki AOKI <junchoon@dec.sakura.ne.jp> Cc: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>, Christian Weisgerber <naddy@mips.inka.de>, FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Move u2f-devd into base? Message-ID: <C7E2DE69-6617-450B-BCEE-BCE2C9894E7F@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20240109013058.22807f3816603829316cef4c@dec.sakura.ne.jp> References: <ZZwLx1RxlY6xuvFV@lorvorc.mips.inka.de> <CANCZdfqpbL=QNgTwBveUpBooucX2MbfZnR9dw4w25_TXYOyuDg@mail.gmail.com> <20240109013058.22807f3816603829316cef4c@dec.sakura.ne.jp>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On 8 Jan 2024, at 16:30, Tomoaki AOKI <junchoon@dec.sakura.ne.jp> wrote: > > So it should be in ports to adapt for latest products more quickly than > in base, I think. We push out a new release of each of the -STABLE branches every 6 months and can do ENs if a product ships and becomes popular in under six months. This shouldn’t be a reason to not do things in the base system. Streamlining the process for ENs (automating them so that there’s a simple flow from review request for a commit on a stable branch to generating the binaries and sending out the announcement) would help a lot and would almost certainly make Colin happier about his workload. Davidhelp
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?C7E2DE69-6617-450B-BCEE-BCE2C9894E7F>