Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 9 Nov 2004 18:40:38 +0000
From:      Ceri Davies <ceri@submonkey.net>
To:        Ken Smith <kensmith@cse.Buffalo.EDU>
Cc:        freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: standard-supfile = stable-supfile with 5.3 ?
Message-ID:  <20041109184038.GQ57641@submonkey.net>
In-Reply-To: <20041109163455.GM16345@electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU>
References:  <41907C91.9000706@yahoo.com> <20041109163455.GM16345@electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--pJM5huthTAeUAjuT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Nov 09, 2004 at 11:34:55AM -0500, Ken Smith wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 09, 2004 at 05:15:13PM +0900, Rob wrote:
>=20
> > The two files
> >=20
> >  /usr/src/share/examples/cvsup/standard-supfile
> >  /usr/src/share/examples/cvsup/stable-supfile
> >=20
> > both have
> >=20
> >    *default release=3Dcvs tag=3DRELENG_5
> >=20
> > although the first one claims to download CURRENT.
> >=20
> > And, eh, why is the filename "standard-supfile" and
> > why not the more obvious "current-supfile" ?
>=20
> I'm not sure I understand.  How was your system brought up to the
> new release - was it a CD install or cvsup-ed?  If cvsup-ed what did
> you use as the tag during the cvsup?
>=20
> I'm seeing what you expect both in CVS and on a system installed from
> CD:
>=20
> harlow 1 % cd /usr/share/examples/cvsup/
> harlow 2 % grep "default release" standard-supfile stable-supfile
> standard-supfile:*default release=3Dcvs tag=3DRELENG_5_3
> stable-supfile:*default release=3Dcvs tag=3DRELENG_5
> harlow 3 % uname -a
> FreeBSD harlow.cse.buffalo.edu 5.3-RELEASE FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE #3: Thu No=
v  4 16:14:06 EST 2004     root@harlow.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys=
/SMP  i386
> harlow 4 %
>=20
> The standard-supfile is meant for people who want to track the release
> branch as Errata/Security updates get applied to it.

Hmm.  share/examples/cvsup/README says:

  To maintain the sources for the FreeBSD-current release, use:

    standard-supfile            Main source tree

    ports-supfile               Ports collection

  To maintain the sources for the FreeBSD-stable release, use:

    stable-supfile              Main source tree

This implies that standard-supfile should be changed to track -HEAD.
It does make sense that it should track RELENG_X_Y (RELENG_5_3 in this
case) though.

> The stable-supfile
> is meant for people who want to track the *development* branch, which
> is not recommended for people who do not have the time to watch over
> the freebsd-stable mailing list (on occasion mistakes do happen in the
> development branch and other development work can at times cause
> glitches people need to be aware of).

stable-supfile is correct then; we just need to correct the README.

Ceri
--=20
Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm
not sure about the former.			  -- Einstein (attrib.)

--pJM5huthTAeUAjuT
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFBkQ8mocfcwTS3JF8RAt9UAJ9i2WS4jpGZwYJRcVH/4mDsD1bGBACgw+GX
fSlwtSjh8wFS36bTZW0MY/E=
=6pEA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--pJM5huthTAeUAjuT--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041109184038.GQ57641>