Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 02:33:58 -0800 From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> To: John <freebsd-lists@potato.growveg.org> Cc: "freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org" <freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: release or stable, for wifi Message-ID: <CAJ-Vmokju0iTrEJSUk9Tw9qU4U7UMS_i7-a-25mK9JJutnfJ6w@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20140211103131.GA27302@potato.growveg.org> References: <20140211103131.GA27302@potato.growveg.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I'm a big fan of -HEAD. -a On 11 February 2014 02:31, John <freebsd-lists@potato.growveg.org> wrote: > Hello list, > > Is it better (for wireless) to follow 10-R, 10-STABLE or 11? The > situation is an acer aspire v5 netbook. I'm running new xorg because > it's an amd c70 with a radeon chipset. Thing is, it needs some kind of > reliability. Wireless is provided by the ath0 driver. > > thanks, > -- > John > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-wireless > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-wireless-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJ-Vmokju0iTrEJSUk9Tw9qU4U7UMS_i7-a-25mK9JJutnfJ6w>