Date: Tue, 21 Dec 1999 17:13:20 +0100 From: "D. Rock" <rock@dead-end.net> To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ATA errors and AUTO_EOI Message-ID: <385FA720.FAC2CB0E@dead-end.net> References: <199912211700.SAA13589@dorifer.heim3.tu-clausthal.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Oliver Fromme schrieb: > > Doug White wrote in list.freebsd-current: > > On Tue, 21 Dec 1999, Soren Schmidt wrote: > > > It seems Dieter Rothacker wrote: > > > > The solution for me was to recompile the kernel without AUTO_EOI1 and > > > > AUTO_EOI2. > > > > > > Those options newer worked (for me at least) reliably with anything, could > > > those that are seeing the hangs please check this ?? > > > > Although this isn't immediately related to ATA, I've found that Intel > > L440GX+ boards *hate* AUTO_EOI_2 when running SMP. They freeze going into > > multiuser mode. Took me quite a while to figure that out. > > I have always been using AUTO_EOI_1, but _not_ AUTO_EOI_2, and > it has always worked very well. > > The comment in LINT about AUTO_EOI_2 sounds pretty suspicous, > so I never even tried it: "it works for some clones and some > integrated versions." That sounds to me like "it works on a > very limited set of hardware (and if you're lucky)." > > AUTO_EOI_1 seems to be fine, though. Same for me. Except for my laptop, which didn't even like AUTO_EOI_1 (which is also mentioned in LINT, but noticed it only at 3rd read). Daniel To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?385FA720.FAC2CB0E>