Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 14 May 1998 00:30:42 -0400 (EDT)
From:      Mikhail Teterin <mi@aldan.algebra.com>
To:        current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   soft updates and async
Message-ID:  <199805140430.AAA05562@rtfm.ziplink.net>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.95.980513202945.10860F-100000@current1.whistle.com> from "Julian Elischer" at "May 13, 98 08:30:41 pm"

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

Ok, it turns out you need the filesystem mount sync to use softupdates.

My understanding was: softupdates are faster then sync and safer
then sync. Is not async still faster, even at the expense of safety?

Will I be able to combine async and softupdates in the future and why
would I want to?

Thanks a lot!

	-mi

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199805140430.AAA05562>