Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 12 Nov 2007 12:01:47 +0000
From:      mustkaru <karu.pruun@googlemail.com>
To:        "Beech Rintoul" <beech@freebsd.org>
Cc:        freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: RELENG_7: swap_pager_getswapspace(3): failed
Message-ID:  <a05fd0ec0711120401v25396954wfb3705e4513af21a@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <47382470.3070001@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <a05fd0ec0711111204p6ea58851n81bb9457eecaba30@mail.gmail.com> <4737869B.7020105@FreeBSD.org> <a05fd0ec0711111533x2e5938ebx40121dd946fe2c04@mail.gmail.com> <200711120020.26076.beech@freebsd.org> <47382470.3070001@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Nov 12, 2007 10:01 AM, Kris Kennaway <kris@freebsd.org> wrote:
>
> Beech Rintoul wrote:
> > On Sunday 11 November 2007, mustkaru said:
> >> On Nov 11, 2007 10:47 PM, Kris Kennaway <kris@freebsd.org> wrote:
> >>> mustkaru wrote:
> >>>> Hi,
> >>>>
> >>>> I updated to RELENG_7 two yesterday, and under usual load
> >>>> started getting hundreds of messages
> >>>>
> >>>> swap_pager_getswapspace(3): failed
> >>>>
> >>>> The system swap is 96% full; it is less than 20% usually under
> >>>> the same load. The system started to kill off processes because
> >>>> of lack of swap space:
> >>>>
> >>>> pid 52606 (thunderbird-bin), uid 1001, was killed: out of swap
> >>>> space swap_pager_getswapspace(2): failed
> >>>> pid 13984 (evince), uid 1001, was killed: out of swap space
> >>>>
> >>>> I suppose there's no way to get back to the more stable BETA2 ?
> >>>> When cvsuping, I noticed
> >>>>
> >>>> 52815 Nov  8 14:03 vm_page.c
> >>>>
> >>>> had been changed. Might it be related to that? Might a next
> >>>> possible change in that get back a more stable swapper. . .?
> >>> This means you ran out of swap space because applications were
> >>> requesting more virtual memory than your system contains.  This
> >>> is an application issue, not a kernel issue.
> >>>
> >>> Kris
> >> I hope so. It is weird though that I run exactly the same number of
> >> applications every day; and I ran the same binary apps on an
> >> earlier version of RELENG_7 (I updated system but not apps), but I
> >> never ran out of swap space; in particular I have never used more
> >> than .5 GB swap. This time, the system was using 1 GB swap. So I
> >> suppose I should start hunting the guilty app.
> >
> > I'm seeing the exact same thing. I'm running -current from yesterday
> > and this box is lightly loaded. I can't track it down to a specific
> > process, but all of a sudden normal compiles are running me out of
> > vm. This box has 500Mb ram and a gig of swap and has never run out of
> > memory before. None of my applications have changed. I'm also
> > starting to see it on a client's box I recently updated to 7.0, That
> > box has 1Gb ram and 2Gb swap and is just a desktop and mailserver.
> > I don't think this is application related.
>
> Then you have further investigation to do to prove that theory :)
>
> Kris
>
>

I suspect it's tunderbird (version 2.0.0.6 (20071101)) and not the system.

I admit I wasn't quite precise when saying Im using *all the same*
apps. I realized this morning that after upgrading, I installed the
above version of binary thunderbird package. The phenomenon is well
reproducable: when Im running my normal set of apps, nothing happens.
Then I start thunderbird, start downloading messages, and swap space
hits the ceiling. Then the system kills off thunderbird. I can even
start thunderbird alone and have the same effect.

So I wonder if that's the same that you're seeing on your two machines?

Must

--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?a05fd0ec0711120401v25396954wfb3705e4513af21a>