Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2002 19:56:21 +0300 From: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.org> To: Franz Klammer <klammer@webonaut.com> Cc: Marc Recht <recht@contentmedia.de>, Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@FreeBSD.org>, aztlanet@gmx.net, gnome@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: GNOME 2.1 upgrade Message-ID: <3D9B2535.72563F59@FreeBSD.org> References: <1033527725.295.11.camel@unxstar> <20021002104009.5a55baec.recht@contentmedia.de> <1033548212.1085.1.camel@gyros.marcuscom.com> <20021002104727.590f03a0.recht@contentmedia.de> <1033558909.38552.2.camel@ncc-1701.webonaut.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Franz Klammer wrote: > > Am Mi, 2002-10-02 um 10.47 schrieb Marc Recht: > > > This isn't going to happen anytime soon. We're shipping 4.7-RELEASE > > > with 1.4.1 as the default GNOME desktop. The primary reasons being lack > > Oh. Ok, then dropping 1.4.1 isn't that good idea.. :-) > > > > > of fully working I18N and most GNOME 2 apps are still beta at best. > > Indeed. > > > > > I think doing -devel versions is the way to go if 2.1 is put into the > > > tree. The downside of this is that there will be one more version of > > > GNOME to support. > > But, as you mentioned yourself, GNOME2 is beta. So, why not replacing the components with "official" beta versions? > > > from this point of view i go along with marc. > > maybee you send some people the ports who want test 2.1 > and if they don't have problems commit them. > > i glad to test the ports because there are still my xinerma-problems. > currently i've turend off my second monitor. I agree with Franz and Marc - we don't really need to have yet another GNOME version in the tree. -Maxim To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-gnome" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3D9B2535.72563F59>