Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2021 08:06:12 +0200 From: Andrea Venturoli <ml@netfence.it> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Deprecating base system ftpd? Message-ID: <247fdded-c8c1-1116-6dc5-4b4a61af1f7a@netfence.it> In-Reply-To: <425D60FC-3A9A-4DFA-B793-13B821AFDA7D@codelibre.net> References: <CAPyFy2AbP2X339zbemZ9Y8edjNKdyygnR9mH48Q78nxwDtOBAg@mail.gmail.com> <eda59707-46cf-d7c1-512e-39a141cfda61@grosbein.net> <425D60FC-3A9A-4DFA-B793-13B821AFDA7D@codelibre.net>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On 4/5/21 8:27 PM, Roger Leigh wrote: > Can I ask, for those who do enable it, why isn’t “sftp” acceptable (or “scp”)? Because it's an *incompatible* replacement. While I never enabled ftpd, I was once asked to. I refused and enabled sftp instead: the problem was that for 99% of the customers on the other side of the wire, this wasn't the same thing. It was hard to make them change their habits, their clients, etc... That said, I vote for moving ftpd to ports. Just my 2c.help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?247fdded-c8c1-1116-6dc5-4b4a61af1f7a>