Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2015 17:33:34 -0700 From: Tim Kientzle <tim@kientzle.com> To: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> Cc: =?utf-8?Q?Manuel_St=C3=BChn?= <freebsdnewbie@freenet.de>, freebsd-arm <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: armv6 vs armv6hf Message-ID: <C111345D-373E-48F5-9D92-9381D3A6A0D0@kientzle.com> In-Reply-To: <0B2332B9-EF54-4849-AA9C-9B6656CD6684@bsdimp.com> References: <558D3EC7.6030009@freenet.de> <0B2332B9-EF54-4849-AA9C-9B6656CD6684@bsdimp.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On Jun 26, 2015, at 10:48 AM, Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> wrote: >=20 >=20 >> On Jun 26, 2015, at 6:00 AM, Manuel St=C3=BChn = <freebsdnewbie@freenet.de> wrote: >>=20 >> Hi list, >>=20 >> according to https://wiki.freebsd.org/FreeBSD/arm/crossbuild, = "[..]armv6 >> architecture is being deprecated in favor of armv6hf, which gives = better >> floating point performance." >>=20 >> What is the expected time when FreeBSD officially switches to = armv6hf? >=20 > I expect we=E2=80=99ll pull the switch in armv6 without changing the = name > by the end of July. Would that break native upgrades? (I=E2=80=99m not necessarily objecting, just curious.) Tim
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?C111345D-373E-48F5-9D92-9381D3A6A0D0>