Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 23 Jan 2012 13:27:20 -0700
From:      Chad Perrin <perrin@apotheon.com>
To:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Horrible installer (was: Re: FreeBSD 9)
Message-ID:  <20120123202720.GB21884@hemlock.hydra>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1201231921180.15400@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
References:  <BLU160-W54C133B8003EF140C41EF7AE860@phx.gbl> <4F180C83.9090100@my.gd> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1201231921180.15400@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 07:25:03PM +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> 
> And IMHO sysinstall should not exist, while good documentation about
> installing BY HAND should be there.

I agree with the part of that sentence following the comma.  That is all.


> 
> Someone that cannot install it him/herself will not be able to ever
> manage it after so why waste time.
> 
> Do not forget that FreeBSD is for unix users, contrary to linux
> which is for windoze haters.
> 
> 
> Again i propose removing sysinstall altogether.

Automation is good, provided it does not eliminate useful options and
flexibility.  You seem unaware of this fact in the general case, for some
reason.

-- 
Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ]



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120123202720.GB21884>