Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 20 Dec 2018 14:00:00 -0800
From:      Matthew Macy <mat.macy@gmail.com>
To:        "Eugene M. Zheganin" <eugene@zhegan.in>
Cc:        freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: The future of ZFS in FreeBSD
Message-ID:  <CAPrugNrf=X=aGxx1YR9qcZUsTk9hYSbMqaGXUcR72A39wVssqw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4481f3cb-4535-bed3-c09f-429553f8f88b@zhegan.in>
References:  <CAPrugNriggEMMnLTZtf6xNQNYajBYNMnGdN96-ejDYQonoOhgw@mail.gmail.com> <20181219163033.jwm7opiwmdhbk6p3@mutt-hbsd> <a64a41fd-f287-cf9d-cd4c-9e55c21c2f00@freebsd.org> <4481f3cb-4535-bed3-c09f-429553f8f88b@zhegan.in>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 03:11 Eugene M. Zheganin <eugene@zhegan.in> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> On 19.12.2018 23:32, Allan Jude wrote:
> > The biggest thing to remember is that this is still OpenZFS, and still
> > run by the same developers as it has been. We are just commonizing on
> > the repo that has the most features integrated into it.
>
> Does it mean that ZoF and thus FreeBSD will lose NFSv4 ACLs because
> there is no such thing in ZoL ?



No, but the ZTS will need to have ACL tests re-added. Please help out by
aiding in getting this merged:

https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/pull/7728

Thanks.
-M



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAPrugNrf=X=aGxx1YR9qcZUsTk9hYSbMqaGXUcR72A39wVssqw>