Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 9 Mar 2001 13:36:06 -0500 (EST)
From:      Rik Faith <faith@valinux.com>
To:        anholt@teleport.com
Cc:        freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org, dri-devel@sourceforge.net
Subject:   Re: [Dri-devel] FreeBSD DRM and Voodoo3
Message-ID:  <15017.8854.78950.505575@light.alephnull.com>
In-Reply-To: [Eric Anholt <anholt@teleport.com>] Thu  8 Mar 2001 22:06:16 -0800
References:  <01030822061600.04246@positron.anholt.dyn.dhs.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu  8 Mar 2001 22:06:16 -0800,
   Eric Anholt <anholt@teleport.com> wrote:
> Well, I've backed down to -stable and updated the FBSD DRM modules. They now 
> use the new templated architecture.  Unfortunately, I haven't ported the 
> other non-tdfx drivers over to it.  Still, it should help the voodoo3 users, 
> and porting of the other drivers shouldn't be too hard thanks to the 
> templates.

Note that the trunk no longer depends on /proc, so I think that the
libdrm code (i.e., in xf86drm.c) should now be OS-independent at the
source level.  The goal would be eventually to make this code shared by
moving it out of the os-dependent/<OS> directory.  Does this impact your
work, or does the compatibilty mode take care of this issue?  --Rik.



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-multimedia" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?15017.8854.78950.505575>