Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2015 19:18:56 +0200 From: Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org> To: Adrian Chadd <adrian.chadd@gmail.com>, Andrew Turner <andrew@fubar.geek.nz> Cc: Oleksandr Tymoshenko <gonzo@FreeBSD.org>, "src-committers@freebsd.org" <src-committers@FreeBSD.org>, "svn-src-all@freebsd.org" <svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org>, "svn-src-head@freebsd.org" <svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r290245 - in head/sys/contrib/vchiq/interface: vchi vchiq_arm Message-ID: <56379B00.60905@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <CAJ-VmomsPufnG75MDbtXdHUhLC-CN7QwqxpaC6UH-QyQTo8eYg@mail.gmail.com> References: <201511012217.tA1MHdMJ047219@repo.freebsd.org> <20151102093603.0aebe7a8@bender.Home> <CAJ-VmomsPufnG75MDbtXdHUhLC-CN7QwqxpaC6UH-QyQTo8eYg@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 02/11/2015 18:13, Adrian Chadd wrote: > The same reason we don't use it for dri, etc. > > The vendor driver isn't portable by any stretch. We could put it > there, but then we'd have to maintain the vendor changes on top of it > in subversion and I kinda dont want to think about how that'll work > out.. :) Same as, say, ZFS? -- Andriy Gapon
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?56379B00.60905>