Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2004 14:30:19 -0800 (PST) From: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at> To: freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: standards/60772: _Bool and bool should be unsigned Message-ID: <200401042230.i04MUJm2039334@freefall.freebsd.org>
index | next in thread | raw e-mail
The following reply was made to PR standards/60772; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>
To: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
Cc: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: standards/60772: _Bool and bool should be unsigned
Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2004 22:23:46 +0000
On Sun, Jan 04, 2004 at 05:40:15AM -0800, Bruce Evans wrote:
>
> We have gcc's stdbool.h in RELENG_4 but don't install it. It uses:
>
> % typedef enum
> % {
> % false = 0,
> % true = 1
> % } bool;
>
> This causes slightly different problems than typedef "int bool". I
> noticed the following:
Also, the standard requires that bool, true, and false are #defines.
Tony.
--
f.a.n.finch <dot@dotat.at> http://dotat.at/
MULL OF KINTYRE TO ARDNAMURCHAN POINT: SOUTH VEERING SOUTHWEST AT 4 OR 5
LOCALLY 6, DECREASING 3 OR 4 FOR A TIME. RAIN FOR MUCH OF THE TIME. MODERATE
DECREASING POOR AT TIMES. MODERATE TO ROUGH.
home |
help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200401042230.i04MUJm2039334>